Wednesday, May 29, 2019

7th Century: Unmarried Sex Relation with Slave women


Did Islam in 7th century allow a Muslim man to treat the slave women as concubines (mistresses) without a legally binding marriage?



Islam does not support  any form of concubinage (a woman living with a man but not married), and categorically prohibits sexual relations between a man and a woman unless they are lawfully married to one another.


In this respect, the only difference between a "free" woman and a slave is that whereas the former must receive a dower from her husband,


no such obligation is imposed on a man who marries his rightfully owned slave (lit., "one whom his right hand possesses") - that is, a woman taken captive in a "holy war" (jihad ) waged in defence of the Faith or of liberty 


for, in such a case, the freedom conferred upon the bride by the very act of marriage is considered to be equivalent to a dower.


The above refers to the previously revealed, general laws relating to marriage

(see Quran  Chapter 2:221,

Quran Chap 4: Verses 3-4 and Verses 19-25,



WHY DID MICHAEL HART Rank Muhammad the most influential Leader in History?


WHY DID MICHAEL HART Rank Muhammad the  most influential Leader  in History



My choice of Muhammad to lead the list of the world’s most influential persons may surprise some readers and may be questioned by others,


But he was the only man in history who was supremely successful on both the secular and religious level. ...

It is probable that the relative influence of Muhammad on Islam has been larger than the combined influence of Jesus Christ and St. Paul on Christianity. ...


It is this unparalleled combination of secular and religious influence which I feel entitles Muhammad to be considered the most influential single figure in human history.

Michael Hart Book 100 Ranking of the most influential people in history


A Great Jewish Scholar Leopold Weiss On Justice in Palestine


Being a Jew, Leopold Weiss came in close contact with some of the Zionist leaders. One of them was Dr. Chaim Weizmann, the undisputed leader of the Zionist movement.


He met him in the house of one of his Jewish friends and had the following conversation with him:


He was talking of the financial difficulties which were besetting the dream of a Jewish National Home, and the insufficient response to this dream among people abroad;


and I had the disturbing impression that even he, like most of the other Zionists, was inclined to transfer the moral responsibility for all that was happening in Palestine to the 'outside world.'


This impelled me to break through the deferential hush with which all the other people present were listening to him, and to ask:


"What about the Arabs?"


I must have committed a faux pas by thus bringing a jarring note into the conversation, for Dr. Weizmann turned his face slowly toward me, put down the cup he had been holding in his hand, and repeated my question:


"What about the Arabs ...?"


"Well – how can you ever hope to make Palestine your homeland in the face of the vehement opposition of the Arabs who, after all, are in the majority of the country?"


The Zionist leader shrugged his shoulders and answered drily: "We expect they won't be in a majority after a few years."


"Perhaps so. You have been dealing with this problem for years and must know the situation better than I do. But quite apart from the political difficulties which Arab opposition may or may not put in your way – does not moral aspect of the question ever bother you?


Don't you think that is wrong on your part to displace the people who have always lived in this country?"


"But it is our country," replied Dr. Weizmann, raising his eyebrows.


"We are doing no more than taking back what we have wrongly been deprived of."


"But you have been away from Palestine for nearly two thousand years! Before that you had ruled this country, and hardly ever the whole of it, for less than five hundred years. Don't you think that the Arabs could, with equal justification, demand Spain for themselves – for,


after all, they held sway in Spain for nearly seven hundred years and lost it entirely only five hundred years ago?"


Dr. Weizmann had visibly become impatient:


"Nonsense. The Arabs had only conquered Spain; it had never been their original homeland, and so it was only right that in the end they were driven out by the Spaniards."


"Forgive me," I retorted, "but it seems to me that there is some historical oversight here. After all, the Hebrews also came as conquerors to Palestine.


Long before them were many other Semitic and non-Semitic tribes settled here – the Amorites, the Edomites, the Philistines, the Moabites, the Hitties.


Those tribes continued living here even in the days of kingdoms of Israel and Judah. They continued living here after the Romans drove our ancestors away.


They are living here today. The Arabs who settled in Syria and Palestine after their conquest in seventh century were always only a small minority of the population; the rest of what we describe today as Palestinians or Syrian "Arabs" are in reality only the Arabianized, original inhabitants of the country.


Some of them became Muslims in the course of centuries, others remained Christians; the Muslims naturally inter-married with their co-religionists from Arabia.


But can you deny that the bulk of those people in Palestine, who speak Arabic, whether Muslims or Christians, are direct-line descendents of the original inhabitants; original in the sense of having lived in this country centuries before the Hebrews came to it?"


Dr. Weizmann smiled politely at my outburst and turned the conversation to other topics.

Women's Rights in Islam as per the QURAN



 Womens rights can be argued both ways, one based on genuine Islamic principles and one based on the male dominated interpretation of womens rights 

The verse from the Quran : 2:223

“Your wives are your fields, so go into your fields whichever way you like,  and send [something good] ahead for yourselves. Be mindful of God: remember that you will meet Him.’ [Prophet], give good news to the believers.




 Islam is the religion that liberates women. In fact, Islam was the first religion that talked and put into practice the equality of women. I recommend any woman or man to read the book
( Liberating the woman in the message's era by Dr. Abdul halim Abou Shoqa)


Many prolific  Islam haters  view that Muslim women  have either crumbled into submission or more often melted without but hardened within.

Docile, demure and modestly silent, many Muslim women keep their husbands  financial accounts, give excellent advice and manage the household as leaders of the household.

The home of a Muslim husband is not his castle but his wife’s fortress.

To others she may appear to behave like a slave but she is the real minister of the interior . She has a marvellous mingling of love, kindnesses and independence though at times jealous.

No blogger on  has written pieces on the behavior of  American, European, Chinese, Japanese husbands’ fear of their tough and dominating and jealous wives oppressing their husbands.

There are wives in all Western cultures who dominate, exert undesirable influence  and nag. But there is so much of unfair and one sided criticism of Muslim women’s voluntary obedience .

Greater bullying by European wives are safely swept under the carpet

In many Muslim countries, gender-based discrimination, coupled with social and cultural barriers, limits access and participation of women in higher education.

Some people attribute these barriers to the teachings of Islam, but this is false. We have this in plenty among the Hindu women in India in the rural areas.


The teachings of the Holy Prophet of Islam emphasize

“the acquiring of knowledge as bounden duties of each Muslim from the cradle to the grave” and that “the quest for knowledge and science is obligatory upon every Muslim man and woman.”


One-eighth (that is, 750 verses) of the Quraan (the Muslim Holy Book) exhort believers to study nature, to reflect, and to make the best use of reason in their search for the ultimate truth.

Good education concentrating more on women  may eventually solve some of the problems that the prejudiced critics of Islam attack 

Muslim countries vary greatly in their culture, traditions, and social systems, and there is a wide range of attitudes toward educating women at the university level. For example, in Egypt, women have attended university since the 1920s

The percentage of females enrolled in science and technology university courses ranges from 70% in the United Arab Emirates to 8% in Djibouti; in Egypt, 35% of science undergraduates are women 

For example, at The Lebanese University, the percentage of women studying engineering increased from 16% in 1992–93 to 20% in 1996–97, and in Syria, the total percentage of women studying civil engineering increased from 14.4% in 1980 to 30.5% in 1994.

A few female scientists from Muslim countries serve on national and international committees


 Islam granted the right of divorce to women 1400 years ago, once no woman could dream of this freedom.

Can non Muslims  show from their scripture a similar right?
Women were not allowed to bear witness in early Jewish society.

In the Christian West, both ecclesiastical and civil law debarred women from giving testimony until late last century.

In Islam the testimony of a woman is accepted as equal to that of a man except in financial cases.

In fact the woman’s testimony can even invalidate the man’s in certain cases.

Inheritance rights were confined exclusively to the male relatives; Islam abolished all these unjust customs and gave all the female relatives inheritance shares.

Before the advent of Islam women were denied basic human dignity.

Regrettably in some Muslim societies, the rights granted to the women by Islam are denied due to the local culture and traditions, for which Islam can not be blamed.


Islam can not be blamed for the local cultural traditions which are found to be against women. [For details read: http://endeavour-peace.page.tl/MuslimWomen.htm]

Is Niqab (covering the face) Islamic or cultural?


Before jumping  to conclusions, let me tell people  the history of Niqab.

Dating back to pre-Islamic Arabia, it was invented by Bedouin (nomadic) women to cover their 
faces as a necessity to protect the skin of their faces from sun rays and dust storm. It was 
just like sun block.

That is the same reason WHY BEDOUIN MEN WEAR "LITHAM" (Niqab for men). 
When Islam came, wearing the Niqab (and litham of course) was already an established custom among the Nomadic Bedouins.

Neither the Quran nor the Prophet has ever told women to wear anything beyond the Khimar 
(head cover that does not cover the face).


Sheikh Al Albani, the most prominent Hadith (Prophets tradition) scholar of our time, said:

"people should not confuse Bedouin customs and traditions with Islam. The Niqab is not Islamic! 
It is Bedouin".


When I got married, my wife wanted to wear Niqab. I stood against it because it was, in my 
opinion, demeaning to women.

She said: "I am just fed up with men ogling( sustained look or stare) me wherever I go"

I steadfastly opposed her wearing Niqab, and she let it go.

Later on, we were at a mall and I realized something:

MEN ARE REALLY OGLING HER! Yes, she is a pretty woman and men were like literally 
eating her with their eyes!!

I was too proud to admit that I was wrong. The irony is that I didn't realize at that time that 
telling a woman not to wear something of her choice is also demeaning!


Syria: The Faces Behind The Terror

Syria: The Faces Behind The Terror